ReportVet | Holter

Veterinary Holter structured for rhythm review, longitudinal comparison, and governed data reuse.

ReportVet Holter frames ambulatory rhythm review as an organized workflow where recordings, annotations, episode summaries, and clinical context remain connected.

This line speaks to specialists, veterinary clinics, and OEM partners with clearer clinical, scientific, and institutional value.

Longitudinal-ready

Long

The exam story is built around comparison, continuity, and review rather than isolated reports.

Audience lanes

3

Specialists, clinics, and OEM partners can follow tailored paths without losing message consistency.

Scientific layer visible

Sci

Teaching, second opinion, de-identification, and research reuse are already part of the solution value.

Product view

One flow for capture, findings, narrative, and final output

This line speaks to specialists, veterinary clinics, and OEM partners with clearer clinical, scientific, and institutional value.

Session rail

01

Session start

The page opens from a clear starting point for capture, context, and the workflow that follows.

02

Captured in context

Media, notes, and observations stay attached to the same structured session instead of drifting apart.

03

Key findings

Relevant findings remain visible in the right place s? review stays easier to follow.

04

Structured review

The record remains legible for discussion, supervision, and later comparison.

05

Final output

The session closes with more reusable material for reporting, communication, and follow-up.

Product in context

Longitudinal-ready

Long

The exam story is built around comparison, continuity, and review rather than isolated reports.

Audience lanes

3

Specialists, clinics, and OEM partners can follow tailored paths without losing message consistency.

Structured output

Sci

Structured review of recordings and relevant episodes
Summary output kept close to interpretation context

Review and follow-up

Longitudinal rhythm continuity

Repeated recordings become easier to compare when annotations, relevant episodes, and interpretation context remain structured across sessions.

Teaching and second opinion

A coherent review structure supports supervised interpretation, peer discussion, and second-opinion workflows.

Clinical flow

Show the exam happening, not just the idea behind it.

Workflow, findings, and structured output stay visible in the same product experience, giving teams a clearer way to evaluate and present the solution.

01

Session start

The page opens from a clear starting point for capture, context, and the workflow that follows.

02

Captured in context

Media, notes, and observations stay attached to the same structured session instead of drifting apart.

03

Key findings

Relevant findings remain visible in the right place s? review stays easier to follow.

04

Structured review

The record remains legible for discussion, supervision, and later comparison.

05

Final output

The session closes with more reusable material for reporting, communication, and follow-up.

Product in context

One flow for capture, findings, narrative, and final output

Structured session

workflow

Session start

The page opens from a clear starting point for capture, context, and the workflow that follows.

Captured in context

Media, notes, and observations stay attached to the same structured session instead of drifting apart.

Key findings

Relevant findings remain visible in the right place s? review stays easier to follow.

Structured review

The record remains legible for discussion, supervision, and later comparison.

By the end of the exam

Longitudinal-ready

Long

The exam story is built around comparison, continuity, and review rather than isolated reports.

Audience lanes

3

Specialists, clinics, and OEM partners can follow tailored paths without losing message consistency.

Scientific layer visible

Sci

Teaching, second opinion, de-identification, and research reuse are already part of the solution value.

What stays useful afterwards

Longitudinal rhythm continuity

Repeated recordings become easier to compare when annotations, relevant episodes, and interpretation context remain structured across sessions.

Teaching and second opinion

A coherent review structure supports supervised interpretation, peer discussion, and second-opinion workflows.

Research and data governance

De-identification, purpose-bound consent, multicenter studies, and curated datasets require explicit structure instead of improvised exports.

Why teams buy it

The value is clinical in the room, operational after the room, and institutional over time.

The promise becomes easier to trust when the workflow is visible, the record stays contextual, and the session ends with reusable material.

Rhythm Review

Recordings, annotations, and summaries stay in the same workflow.

ReportVet Holter organizes review so that relevant episodes, clinical notes, and summary output remain easier to revisit for follow-up and communication.

Structured review of recordings and relevant episodes
Summary output kept close to interpretation context
Better continuity for longitudinal rhythm follow-up
Operations

Services gain a more repeatable base for ambulatory rhythm programs.

The solution already speaks to operational consistency, supervision, and governance, creating a clearer base for institutional use and commercial continuity.

Continuity

The same structure supports clinical continuity, follow-up, and responsible scientific reuse.

This solution sets a consistent foundation for guided evaluation, ongoing partnership, and future research workflows without losing the Holter context.

Clinical infrastructure

Make DICOM, voice, and assisted intelligence visible before the buyer asks for it.

For veterinary workflows, image continuity, DICOM readiness, voice, and assisted intelligence help teams document more consistently without turning the page into hospital jargon.

DICOM beyond the obvious modalities

Show that the platform can structure radiology and visible-light workflows with more organized capture, reusable records, and a clearer path to PACS and institutional expansion when needed.

Voice and assisted intelligence in the actual workflow

Voice speeds up structured documentation, while assisted intelligence helps the professional keep context, findings, and protocol flow aligned without overselling autonomous diagnosis.

Audience paths

Three clear buying paths from the same product.

The same product feels relevant to specialist use, institutional implementation, and OEM strategy without dissolving into generic language.

Specialists

Less report rebuild, more context inside the session.

For specialists who want recordings, episodes, and review context to stay connected.

ReportVet Holter helps specialists review relevant episodes inside a more coherent workflow, without promising automated interpretation.

Less report rebuild, more context inside the session.
Explore path
Clinics

Stronger standardization, quality review, and implementation readiness.

For veterinary services that need Holter operations to scale with traceability.

ReportVet Holter gives clinics a cleaner base for rhythm programs, quality review, and commercial continuity with more context.

Stronger standardization, quality review, and implementation readiness.
Explore path
OEM

Clinical software that increases the perceived value of the device.

For OEM teams that want software to strengthen the veterinary rhythm product line.

The same institutional foundation supports product conversations across locales and audiences without losing commercial coherence.

Clinical software that increases the perceived value of the device.
Explore path
Scientific value

The scientific layer strengthens the platform without stealing the sales conversation.

Teaching, second opinion, longitudinal comparison, atlases, and governed studies matter because the exam was documented well from the start.

Institutional layer

The point is not to turn the page into a research brochure. It is to make clear that a better exam record becomes more valuable over time.

Structured workflow

The workflow stays legible from the start of the session to the final output instead of breaking into detached actions.

Review material

The final output is easier to discuss, compare, teach, and revisit because the session was structured in context.

Institutional use

Supervision, quality review, teaching, and partner evaluation start from the same clearer foundation.

Scientific value

Longitudinal rhythm continuity

Repeated recordings become easier to compare when annotations, relevant episodes, and interpretation context remain structured across sessions.

Teaching and second opinion

A coherent review structure supports supervised interpretation, peer discussion, and second-opinion workflows.

Scientific Layer

Holter benefits from explicit continuity for teaching, review, and governed research.

Ambulatory rhythm data becomes more useful over time when review context is organized. ReportVet Holter keeps longitudinal comparison, teaching, second opinion, and governed reuse explicit for teams evaluating the solution.

Pesquisa, ensino, segunda opinião e continuidade longitudinal fazem parte do valor acumulado da solução.
Reutilização responsável, de-identificação e governança científica continuam legíveis sem virar checklist burocrático.

Longitudinal rhythm continuity

Repeated recordings become easier to compare when annotations, relevant episodes, and interpretation context remain structured across sessions.

Clearer trend review across follow-up recordings
Better continuity for chronic rhythm discussions

Teaching and second opinion

A coherent review structure supports supervised interpretation, peer discussion, and second-opinion workflows.

Case review with clearer annotation context
More usable material for rhythm teaching environments

Research and data governance

De-identification, purpose-bound consent, multicenter studies, and curated datasets require explicit structure instead of improvised exports.

Dataset organization for studies and audits
De-identification-friendly review workflows
Purpose-specific reuse with governance controls
Commercial paths

Choose the right commercial path for this workflow.

Keep the page tied to the exam workflow: Starter stays textual, Pro unlocks structure and automation, and Clinic moves the conversation to team scale.

Commercial terms

Annual contract required. Payment happens upfront with card installment or upfront discount.

Starter

Per veterinarian

12x R$198

Annual contract per physician, or R$2,257.20 upfront

Digitize today's textual workflow without forcing structured protocol adoption on day one.

Unstructured text reports
Reusable text templates
Basic document export
Start Starter

Pro

Recommended

12x R$380

Annual contract per physician, or R$4,332 upfront

The main premium plan for structured protocol workflow, voice, automation, cloud, and operational continuity.

Structured reports by protocol
Click-based workflow
Voice-assisted documentation
Start Pro

Clinic

Scale

Custom

For clinics, veterinary hospitals, and networks

The operational step for multi-physician teams, shared governance, and admin visibility.

Multiple physicians
Team operation
Administrative panel
Talk to sales

Recommendation layer

Find the commercial path that fits your operation today.

Tell us whether you need structured workflow, how many physicians will use the platform, and the expected monthly report volume.

What kind of workflow do you need?

Starter fits textual workflows. Pro fits structured protocols, voice, automation, and cloud.

The low-volume path is only shown when the informed volume makes it relevant.

Regular Pro is the strongest fit.

It gives a single physician the full value jump: structured protocol workflow, voice, automation, cloud, and better operational continuity.

Continue with this path

Lumini

Need another intelligence layer later?

Lumini remains a premium add-on separated from the protocol automation already included in Pro.

Meet Lumini
FAQ

Questions that usually come up before a private evaluation

Does ReportVet Holter automate rhythm interpretation?

No. The platform organizes review, documentation, and structured output. Interpretation and clinical judgment remain with the responsible veterinary team.

Why does this solution highlight data governance?

Because longitudinal rhythm review, teaching, and future research reuse only become trustworthy when data structure and purpose boundaries are explicit.

Is this offer limited to one audience?

No. The same line supports specialists, institutions, and OEM partners without losing message coherence.

Private evaluation

Request a veterinary Holter walkthrough

The form already carries the right context so the next conversation can start from the correct clinical or institutional angle.

Direct with our team
Exam context preserved
Privacy-ready

Context already attached

This request already carries the right context so the next conversation can start from the right clinical or institutional angle.

Current interest

Clinic | exam pricing

By sending this form, you agree with the ReportVet privacy policy.

We use this information to continue the conversation with more context and less back-and-forth.

Private evaluation

See ReportVet Holter in a private walkthrough.

This evaluation should make it clear how structured workflow during the exam becomes reusable output and stronger clinical, institutional, and commercial value.